May
9 2012 (Daily Nation by Patrick Mbataru)—Right from the beginning of his term,
Mr Nicolas Sarkozy rubbed the collective French and African psyches the wrong
way.
He celebrated his victory in 2007 by
dining in a ritzy café in Paris, handing his home critics the first ammunition
against his presidency.
The following day, he reaffirmed what
he wanted his image to be by holidaying with that most apt image of capitalism,
Vincent Bolloré in the billionaire’s 60-metre luxury yacht off Malta.
![]() |
| Nicolas Sarkozy |
The French media had a field day,
accusing the right-wing president-elect of unhealthy links with big business.
And the image of the “president of the
rich” has dogged Mr Sarkozy throughout his tenure. So is his style of
leadership.
Mr Bling Bling, as the tabloid, Le
Canard Enchainé baptised him, had won admiration from many French right-wingers
as the minister for Internal Security for the steadfast way he managed the 2005
riots by youth in poor neighbourhoods whom he referred to as recaille, meaning
scum.
Elected on an anti-Europe,
anti-immigration platform, globally, he was initially welcomed as a departure
from the past as far as French geopolitical stand was concerned.
He styled himself as pro-American,
telling his compatriots that France needed to work with ‘‘like minds’’.
Human rights activists and
pro-democrats in Africa welcomed him. He made the right noises. He had warned
that the French policy on Africa would no longer be the same, which was
interpreted as a warning to African dictators and kleptomaniacs.
It was to be good news. France had
after all, always been seen as an unabashed supporter of bad governance in
Africa so far as its interests were guaranteed.
Sure, Sarkozy did support change in
Cote d’Ivoire, Benin, and most importantly, Senegal.
But again it was because French
interests in these countries would not be threatened by any new order.
However, it is his lecture in 2007 at
Sheikh Anta Diop University in Dakar that summed up his attitude towards Africa
and Africans.
In a most condescending manner, he
told his stunned audience that Africa remained underdeveloped because ‘‘its
people are immersed in outdated practices such as witchcraft’’.
He lectured on how and why Africa
‘‘was never in history and needed to invent itself a destiny’’. But he offered
few answers.
And there was no need to. Within 10
minutes of his homily, only a third of the listeners had remained in the
auditorium.
The reaction was fast and furious:
Boris Diop, the Senegalese novelist, hit back: “A foreign president, looking
down on us, judging inhabitants of an entire continent, demanding that they
finally get away from nature, enter human history and invent themselves a
destiny.”
Prof Achille Mbembe, the acclaimed
Cameroonian historian, answered: “For now, France is simply missing the moral
credit which would allow it to speak about Africa with certitude and
authority.”
Mr Sarkozy’s comments seemed even more
archaic, not least because they came at a time when it was obvious, that
Western powers were losing their traditional clout in Africa.
African scholars generally told
Sarkozy that African problems could only be solved by Africans and not France.
Young people are recognising this.
After half a century of formal
decolonisation, young generations have learned that from France, like from
other world powers, one should not expect much.
These assertions are not in vain.
Reports from world economic analysis point that Africa has the fastest-growing
middle class, a class whose members use more than $300 daily per head.
This is the engine of development.
More Africans are investing than ever before. Governments are investing much
more on infrastructure, education and health.
While many countries are posting
declining economic growth rates, many African countries are experiencing rising
growth rates. Africa will save itself.
Au revoir, Monsieur Sarkozy.
Dr Mbataru teaches at Kenyatta
University’s Department of Agribusiness Management and Trade, and is the author
of ‘‘The coffee crisis: New interests, old interests and the illusion of
Development.”

No comments:
Post a Comment